Is the capacity replacement scheme for transferring clinker capacity to be determined valid?

disposal of phosphogypsum co-production cement clinker production line project is classified as a necessary new cement project at the time of approval, and it should be strictly implemented to formulate a cement clinker capacity replacement plan and implement equivalent capacity replacement. The

capacity replacement plan mainly includes but is not limited to the following contents:

(1) The name of the enterprise to which the construction project belongs, the design capacity, the construction site, the specification, model and quantity of the main equipment, the total energy consumption and emission, and the planned time of ignition and production.

(2) The name of the enterprise whose production capacity is transferred out, the unified social credit code, the specifications, models and quantities of the main equipment, the address, the filing or approval documents, the planned shutdown time and the planned dismantling and withdrawal time, the production license, etc. The

transfer of production capacity should be implemented to enterprises and production lines, and the capacity replacement scheme should not be ambiguous.

For the capacity that can be used to dispose of phosphogypsum co-production cement clinker production line projects need to be transferred out, in the "Measures for the Implementation of Capacity Replacement in Cement Glass Industry (2024 edition)", "Open the net", that is, under the condition that the total production capacity of cement clinker based on 2020 in the province does not increase, the province can adjust the production capacity of the whole province as a whole. According to the disposal amount of phosphorus (titanium, fluorine) gypsum, the number and layout of new projects should be determined scientifically and reasonably, and the equivalent replacement should be implemented. The meaning of

overall planning is unified planning, that is, the clinker production capacity used for co-production projects can be planned and adjusted in a unified way throughout the province, and even the production capacity adjusted across prefectures and cities can be replaced by 1:1 equivalent replacement without reduction replacement.

However, the overall adjustment is not equal to making a statement on the line, there must be a replacement in place to give a clear plan for capacity replacement. Without this clarity, the new project lacks the necessary conditions for its establishment, and the so-called capacity replacement scheme should be regarded as an invalid scheme. The project can not stand up!

In the capacity replacement scheme of a demonstration project of phosphogypsum acid production and recycling of sulfur and calcium resources in a province, the replacement capacity situation gives the vague statement of "overall adjustment of 700000 tons of production capacity for replacement". Which enterprise adjusts the production capacity as a whole? The production capacity from which production line was stopped? There's no explanation! The popular saying is that the transfer capacity is to be determined.

Since the transfer-out capacity is to be determined, can capacity replacement scheme be regarded as valid?