Capacity is called construction scale in the feasibility study report of investment projects. In the study, the rationality of project construction content, scale and product scheme should be evaluated. In the study of project construction scheme, the project production method, production technology and process, supporting engineering, technology source and its realization path should be put forward through technical comparison, and the applicability, maturity, reliability and advancement of project technology should be demonstrated. The specification, quantity and performance parameters of the main equipment (including software) of the proposed project are put forward through equipment comparison and selection, the matching and reliability of the equipment (including software) and technology, the design technical requirements of the equipment and software for the engineering scheme are discussed, and the recommended scheme for the key equipment and software is put forward. The main research conclusions of the
feasibility study report focus on summarizing the project market demand, construction content and scale, operation plan, investment and financing and financial benefits of the proposed recommended scheme, evaluating the effects and risks of all aspects of the project, and putting forward the research conclusions on the feasibility of the project.
Since 2004, except for prohibited investment projects, cement (decentralization) has been approved by provincial government investment authorities. Cement investment projects have done "hands and feet" on the scale of construction. That is to say, in the industry, there are so-called "batches of small and large" and "batches of large and small". If the project does "hands and feet" on the scale of construction, it is fraud.
Since 2014, cement investment projects have been put on record. After
the implementation of the filing system for cement investment projects, the Measures for the Approval and Filing Management of Enterprise Investment Projects clearly stipulate that the project unit shall be responsible for the authenticity, legality and integrity of the information of the filed projects. That is to say, whether the project information submitted by the enterprise is true or not is entirely the responsibility of the enterprise alone, and there is no "umbrella" to approve the red-headed documents. Therefore, after the filing system, there seems to be more rules on the scale of construction. "Batch of small and large" and "batch of large and small" basically appear in the approval period. The construction scale of
investment project is an important part of the feasibility study of the project, and it is a very serious matter. If the construction scale is fraudulent, the Administrative Measures stipulate that the project unit has the act of submitting false information, and the relevant information is included in the abnormal credit record of the project and in the national credit information sharing platform. If an enterprise applies for approval or filing by improper means such as splitting projects, concealing relevant information or providing false declaration materials, the project approval authority shall not accept or approve or file the application, and shall give a warning. For a project subject to archival filing administration, if an enterprise provides false information to the archival filing organ, the archival filing organ shall order it to make corrections within a time limit; if it fails to make corrections within the time limit, it shall be fined not less than 20,000 yuan but not more than 50,000 yuan. Before October 31,
2014, when the cement project is approved, the competent authorities should also conscientiously perform their duties of approval and conduct the examination in strict accordance with the requirements of the prescribed authority, procedures and time limits. It is not allowed to allow the enterprise to falsify the declaration materials or to falsify jointly with the enterprise. For such fraudulent projects, the explanation that "the actual production capacity of newly built or technically transformed cement clinker projects is far greater than registered or approved production capacity is widespread" is weak. In order to promote the unification of actual production capacity and record production capacity, (whitewash "approve small and build large") compliance supplementary production capacity, but did not get the corresponding punishment, is unfair to the traditional compliance enterprises. For the "batch of large and small" projects, the implementation of the transfer capacity replacement according to the approved design capacity has in fact resulted in new capacity.
The Administrative Measures stipulate that after the project filing, the project legal person has changed, and the project construction site, scale and content have changed significantly, the project unit shall inform the project filing organ in time through the online platform, and modify the relevant information. Conducting a feasibility study should be a mandatory procedure before notification. It is by no means based on the formula of addition, subtraction, multiplication and division to achieve the balance of the capacity equation, so that a new "big preparation and small construction" appears. Of course, the autonomy of construction scale lies in enterprises, but the premise is that the construction scale must be reasonable and feasible.
Recently, I saw a message to replenish production capacity. A Φ5.0m * 74 m kiln was originally built in 2011, with (approved) design capacity of 4000 t/d, supplementary capacity of 4000 t/d, and record capacity of 8000 t/d after supplementary. The supplementary capacity comes from the Φ5.0 m * 74 m production line of the same specification built in the same plant in 2012, and the approved design capacity is 4000 t/d. The "elder brother" was replaced by 1:1, and 1 t/d was not left behind.
After investigation, the specification of the two production lines is Φ4.8 m * 72 m on the list of cement clinker production lines in the province where the enterprise is located. That is to say, the production capacity of Φ4.8 m kiln reaches 8000 t/d! Or because the Φ4.8 m kiln reached 8000 t/d, it was really ugly, so the Φ4.8 m was increased to Φ5.0 m in the capacity replacement scheme! Even if it is indeed a Φ5.0 m kiln, the original approved scale of 4000 t/d is a "batch of small and large", and the data on the list is not true. At present, the production capacity is re-determined as 8000 t/d. Whether the process technology is reasonable and feasible is worth deliberating. It is not simply 4000 t/d + 4000 t/d/1 = 8000 t/d. According to the cement clinker capacity conversion table of the previous capacity replacement method, the actual capacity of the Φ5.0 m kiln is 5500 t/d, and the current capacity is 1.45 times of the actual capacity stated in the original document. According to the design capacity of 4000 t/d approved by the original project, an astonishing doubling of production capacity has been achieved.
At first glance, we can not see where such supplementary capacity compliance is!
浙公网安备33010802003254号