Jinko & Longji, Two Photovoltaic Leaders Reconcile?

Digital New Energy DataBM.

is simply, JinkoSolar and Longji Green Energy, the two leading companies, are currently negotiating a settlement .

According to the above two procedural orders, JinkoSolar needs to inform the court of the outcome of the settlement negotiations within six months. According to

the data, on February 14 and July 28 this year, Jingke Energy and Xinyuan Yuedong sued Longji Green Energy and its European subsidiaries for patent infringement in Munich Branch of the European Unified Patent Court.

Since the end of 2024, there has been a lot of fire between JinkoSolar and Longji Green Energy.

According to Digital New Energy DataBM.

leading melee

Maxeon & Aixu shares

Jinko Energy and Longji Green Energy discussed reconciliation, the patent war between Maxeon, a subsidiary of TCL Zhonghuan Holdings, and Aixu shares also ushered in a key node.

It is reported that on August 29, the BC patent infringement case of Maxon and Aixu shares was heard for the second time at the Mannheim District Court in Germany .

According to sources, the court gave Aixu shares four weeks to respond to the written documents submitted by Maxeon; At the same time, the court will issue a court order on the appointment of experts in October (note: the appointment of experts to evaluate and assess the technology at issue).

Previously , in November 2023, Maxeon claimed that ABC component products related to Aixu shares infringed its patent EP2297788B1 . File a patent infringement lawsuit with the German District Court .

In fact, Maxeon also applied to the Hague District Court of the Netherlands for a temporary injunction against ABC products related to Aixu shares, but the court rejected it. Maxeon then filed an appeal, but in May this year, the Hague District Court of the Netherlands withdrew Maxeon's claim because Maxeon failed to pay the bond .

In response, Maxeon issued a clarification announcement on May 21. The company takes into account the advantages of the speed of the European Unified Patent Court (UPC) case and the fact that the judgment of this case can be based on a single European patent directly in 0 HTML. 0 UNK1 4 Including the Netherlands 0 HTML0 UNK1 5 0 HTML0 UNK1 6 After the entry into force of several UPC member countries 0 HTML0 UNK1 7, the decision 0 HTML0 UNK1 8 not to proceed 0 HTML0 UNK1 9 to pursue the appeal case in the Netherlands. However, its 0 HTML0 UNK2 0 patent infringement litigation cases initiated by the Mannheim Regional Court of Germany and the European Unified Patent Court (UPC) 0 HTML0 UNK2 1 are still in progress 0 HTML0 UNK2 2. 0 HTML0 UNK2 3 Trina Solar & Atlas 0 HTML0 UNK2 4

According to the latest procedural notice of patent disputes between the two sides in the United States, the United States International Trade Commission (ITC) has decided to end the 337 investigation on April 21, 2025, and is expected to hear the case in October 2025 and make a preliminary ruling in January 2026. The final ruling was made in May 2026.

For related patents, as of August 22, the case in Delaware Federal Court has been temporarily suspended pending the outcome of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in accordance with other " (expected April 2026).

With regard to domestic patent disputes, Atlas Changshu subsidiary has formally submitted ZL201710975923 to the State Patent Office of China in August 2024

. This patent is the same patent as Trina Solar's request for customs seizure of photovoltaic products shipped to Europe by Atlas for patent infringement in May 2024.

At the same time, Atlas believed that Trina Solar intentionally raised the amount of the subject matter when it knew that the non-infringement lawsuit had been tried by the Suzhou Intermediate People's Court. Without providing any evidence to prove the calculation method of relevant losses and compensation, the prosecution to the Provincial High Court is an obvious act of malicious evasion of jurisdiction .

"On February 21, 2025, the Jiangsu Provincial Higher People's Court ruled that the confirmation of non-infringement lawsuit accepted by the former Suzhou Intermediate Court and the infringement lawsuit initiated by Trina Solar Energy will be tried jointly by the Provincial High Court." As of August 22, the relevant cases are under trial.

The domestic photovoltaic leader is deeply involved in the fierce patent battle, and foreign giants are also waiting for an opportunity to launch an offensive.

First Solar claimed that JinkoSolar and Atlas infringed its TOPCon patent technology US9,130, In February and May, the two enterprises were sued in the Delaware District Court of the United States. At present, the two Chinese enterprises have initiated the IPR procedure ( multi-party review procedure ); In August, the company accused Mundra Solar PV (MSPVL), a subsidiary of Adani Group, an Indian company, of infringing two of its patented solar module manufacturing technologies. Claim damages from the infringer (see < a href = "https://www.databm.com/news/55138959910546115.").