Evergreen is listed in the global ranking TOP20 of clinker production capacity of China's cement enterprises in 2024

2025-02-24 13:30:30

Evergreen ranked 16th in the global clinker production capacity of China's cement enterprises in 2024 with 13.1905 million tons of clinker production capacity.

On January 1,

2025, the much-anticipated " 2024 Top 100 List of China's Cement Clinker Production Capacity" was released, which is the 21st consecutive year that China Cement Network has released the list. Evergreen ranked 16th in the global clinker production capacity of China's cement enterprises in 2024 with 13.1905 million tons of clinker production capacity.

1. This list is the total cement clinker production capacity of Chinese cement enterprises at home and abroad.

2. Data statistics As of December 31, 2024, the production capacity of the new dry process clinker production line has been completed and put into operation, and the production capacity of other kilns and grinding stations has not been counted.

3. The production line is calculated according to the design capacity: daily capacity * 310 days/10000 (10,000 tons/year)

4. The capacity of joint ventures and entrusted enterprises is included in the actual operation management party.

5. When the production capacity is the same, they shall be arranged in the order of the first letter of the pinyin of the enterprise name.

6. This ranking is only based on the data collected by the cement network. If there are any mistakes or omissions, please correct them.

All can be viewed after purchase
Correlation

Evergreen ranked 16th in the global clinker production capacity of China's cement enterprises in 2024 with 13.1905 million tons of clinker production capacity.

2025-02-24 13:30:30

A total of 90 batches of cement products were sampled, including 20 batches of products from 20 sales units in 8 cities such as Xinxiang, Hebi, Zhengzhou and Jiaozuo, 70 batches of products from 70 production units in 10 cities such as Xinxiang, Nanyang, Anyang and Xuchang, and 2 batches of products were found to be unqualified. Among them, two batches of products were unqualified in chloride ion and one batch of products were unqualified in strength, all of which were safety items.