Many "fake central enterprises" were exposed!
On April 21, China Construction exposed 16 counterfeit subsidiaries affiliated to it. For a long time, some illegal elements have registered enterprises as subsidiaries of China Construction Group by forging relevant materials, and carried out business in the name of subsidiaries of China Construction Group. After verification, the following companies and their subsidiaries at all levels are fake state-owned enterprises, which have no affiliation or equity relationship with China State Construction Engineering Corporation, nor any investment, cooperation, business relationship, and all their actions have nothing to do with China State Construction Engineering Corporation. All sectors of society
should be vigilant and pay attention to risk prevention. If they find their illegal and criminal acts, please report them to the public security organs as soon as possible.
The State Energy Group released a list
of 17 fake state-owned enterprises
1.2. Meanwhile, our company will reserve the right to pursue the legal liability of relevant companies and personnel in accordance with the law and safeguard our legitimate rights and interests.
3.
In fact, the problem of "fake central enterprises" has a long history.
For a long time, the SASAC of the State Council has attached great importance to cracking down on counterfeit state-owned enterprises.
In 2019, the SASAC of the State Council fired the starting gun to declare war on "fake central enterprises". Since then, many central and state-owned enterprises whose reputation has been affected have come forward to clarify or cut, claiming that they have no affiliation or equity relationship with themselves, and that there is no investment, cooperation, business relationship, etc. These clarifications have also achieved immediate results, but many "Li Gui" have not stopped, they often choose to change a vest, continue to swindle tricks. Therefore, in 2021 and 2022, SASAC made two centralized announcements of "fake central enterprises" and "fake state-owned enterprises", and 528 enterprises were included in the "blacklist". In October
2021, SASAC exposed the list of counterfeit central enterprises, involving 353 enterprises, registered in 31 provinces, municipalities and 5 cities with separate plans. A year later, on September 20, 2022, the SASAC website published a list of the second batch of counterfeit central enterprises, involving 175 enterprises. (Read the link: SASAC issued! 528 fake central enterprises! Be careful not to be cheated! Why Does the Identity of "Fake Central Enterprises" Attract Many Enterprises? What is the way to make profits? And how should it be identified?
Millions can Become "Fake Central Enterprises"?
So many listed companies suffer from it, is it true that any company can be affiliated with the name of the central enterprises?
Usually, central enterprises in a broad sense are divided into three categories:
first, enterprises managed by the SASAC of the State Council, with a total of 98 enterprises by the end of 2022;
Second, financial enterprises managed by the Banking Regulatory Commission, the Insurance Regulatory Commission and the Securities Regulatory Commission, such as the five state-owned banks, the Export-Import Bank of China, the Agricultural Development Bank of China and the National Development Bank;
Third, enterprises managed by other departments of the State Council or mass organizations are located in tobacco, gold, railway passenger and freight transport, ports, airports, radio, television, culture, publishing and other industries.
In social platforms such as Weibo and Tieba, we can search for many accounts that are affiliated with state-owned enterprises and central enterprises. These accounts will highlight the benefits of affiliation in the text or video content they send, and leave telephone numbers for consultation.
It can make plans for companies with affiliation needs according to industry and budget, and the prices of companies with different levels of affiliation are also different. For example, 1.8 million yuan is needed for 2 hanging 3, 1.3 million yuan for 3 hanging 4 and 900,000 yuan for 4 hanging 5. Take 2 hanging 3 as an example, level 3 is the company that operates normally, and level 2 is the "interlayer" that this kind of intermediary helps to do.
"We are the intermediary and are only responsible for the front end." From the description of intermediary Xiaocheng (pseudonym), its business content is more like an intermediary, which is only responsible for bridging companies in need. And the plan it shows is to be a third-level subsidiary of the State Power Company.
It is worth mentioning that intermediaries also have their own principles. Another intermediary, Lao Feng, said that he did not work in the power industry because the industry is now all fake state-owned enterprises. Lao Feng's fees are also higher, 3 hang 4 need 2 million, the reason is that the affiliated company has real business, not a shell company, "the boss legal person knows.".
It should be noted that the above amounts are one-year prices, which is also the reason why "fake central enterprises" seldom hang under the name of a shareholder of a central enterprise for more than one year. More "fake central enterprises" investors change very frequently, and Shijin Jianong has similar characteristics. Since March 2021, its investors have changed four times, from private enterprises to central enterprises, state-owned enterprises and then back to private enterprises. Shareholders have experienced three changes in China Traditional Chinese Medicine Newspaper, China Electronic Information Industry Group and State Material Reserve Bureau.
A local market regulator said that if a company wants to change its shareholders, the electronic process requires the new shareholders to do real-name certification, and on-site handover requires a copy of the business license and signature on the relevant agreement. In other words, the above operations can hardly be handled without the knowledge of the parent company.
However, the connection between intermediaries and "insiders" may not be true. Recently, China Nuclear Huineng said that it had found that illegal elements had registered as subsidiaries of the company by forging relevant materials, and that there might be cases of illegal activities in the name of subsidiaries of China Nuclear Huineng.
In the previous announcements issued by the central enterprises, forging official seals and false certificates are also the main ways for the transformation of "fake central enterprises". Why is
a fake identity worth a thousand pieces of gold? Shen Meng, director
of Xiangsong Capital, pointed out that the reason why fake central enterprises are popular is that in the current market environment, the risk of cooperation with central enterprises is the lowest and the return is the most stable, which can bring performance guarantee to the partners. "Central enterprises have the advantage of super market, which can bring benefits that other types of enterprises can not reach." Liu Junhai, director of the Institute of Commercial Law of Renmin University of
China, believes that the reason why the central enterprises are frequently "touching porcelain" lies in the credit and resource advantages behind the central enterprises, especially in the construction and financial industries, which are the hardest hit areas of the "pseudo-central enterprises", and the resources are indeed inclined to the state-owned enterprises, especially the central enterprises.
Take the well-known case of cooperation between the central government and the people of Rongyu Group (now known as Haochen Medical) as an example. In 2018, Rongyu Group welcomed the investment of China Nuclear National Finance, and the two sides intend to build a fund investment platform with a scale of 5 billion to 10 billion yuan in three years. Rongyu Group also wants to return the favor by investing in China Nuclear Finance and its affiliated companies to develop projects in countries along the "the Belt and Road".
" This is basically for business. " Lao Feng said, "For example, Party a requires you to be a state-owned enterprise background, take over the business first, and then use other companies to operate."
With the endorsement of central enterprises, financing will be more convenient.As the drawer, Shijin Jianong and China Railway Haotian have obviously enjoyed many benefits such as delayed payment of commercial acceptance bills and reduced financial costs.
Earlier, even some companies, under the banner of "shareholders of central enterprises", issued financial products with high interest rates as bait, and countless people were deceived.
, it is worth noting that although the departments concerned have time and again cracked down on counterfeit goods, However, some "fake central enterprises" do not seem to have been greatly affected. For example, after the State Power Company emphasized that it had not made foreign investment for 20 years, Xiaocheng was still receiving orders from the State Power Company.
Liu Junhai believes that the reason why "fake central enterprises" are difficult to find is that on the one hand, many central enterprises have complex hierarchical structures, and there are loopholes in the supervision of the parent company's foreign investment of its subsidiaries; on the other hand, it is also related to the opacity of the central enterprises'foreign investment information, even if they encounter "fake central enterprises", there is no place to check. Bai Wenxi, chief economist
of IPG China, believes that "fake central enterprises" are the product of institutional premium and are related to the current environment, which is difficult to eradicate without breaking the institutional environment. "The reason for the emergence of fake central enterprises is that on the one hand, some real central enterprises hope to collect disguised" authorization fees "and" license fees "from the market under their own names; on the other hand, the market actively counterfeits central enterprises to gain trust, resources or opportunities to enter some specific fields. This also shows that as a central enterprise itself has the nature of administrative monopoly, which is the root of the premium of the central enterprise system.
In Bai Wenxi's view, in order to eradicate the fake central enterprises, we need to start with breaking the system premium of the central enterprises. The areas that can be marketized can be marketized as much as possible, and the central enterprises can be encouraged to enter a few areas that can not be completely marketized and can only be directly operated by the government. This not only eliminates the destruction of the market mechanism caused by the central enterprises entering the competitive field and competing with the people for profits, but also helps to improve the overall operational efficiency of the economic system, and at the same time, it can also eliminate the system premium of the central enterprises caused by administrative monopoly, as well as the resulting problems of fake central enterprises.